Society’s letter on greenbelt development to ‘Advertiser & Times’

LymTimes masthead

9 August 2013
The Editor, Lymington Advertiser & Times, 62 Old Milton Road, New Milton BH25 6EH

Dear Editor
Re: Greenbelt development
There’s been a lot of interest in your columns recently about the Council’s proposals to allocate greenbelt sites in Lymington and Pennington for development of around 150 additional homes. Similarly, there’s been considerable comment on the Milford-on-Sea initiative to develop a Neighbourhood Plan focusing on finding a number of smaller sites for 30 additional homes as an alternative to the Council’s proposal to allocate them all to a single site at School Lane. We’d like to bring your readers up to date on the status of these proposals and the Society’s view of the way forward.

Lymington Society’s view
We agree on the desperate need for affordable housing locally. The issue is how and where to deliver these affordable homes. We have resisted the NFDC’s proposal to allocate greenbelt sites at Alexandra Road, Lymington and the Pinetops site in Ramley Road Pennington. The Council justifies this green belt development on the grounds that a high proportion – around 70% – of the new homes would be available through local authority housing and housing associations, with a mix of shared ownership and rentals. They say they have selected these sites from a short-list of sites all of which they consider to be in ‘sustainable’ locations.

We feel this type of approach is in fact unsustainable as it leads to households in isolated developments without access to local facilities like shops and lacking reliable public transport for access to schools and hospitals. It’s not so very different from the kind of thinking that saw the development of poorly designed and located housing estates. It may have been a short-term solution to conditions in post-war Britain but in the twenty-first century our community deserves something better.

What we did
In March 2013 the Society wrote to the Lymington and Pennington Town Council asking them to consider taking advantage of the 2011 Localism Act to ask the NFDC for their agreement to undertake a Neighbourhood Plan and offering our enthusiastic support in its preparation. We suggested that rather like the initiative that was underway at the time in Milford-on-Sea, we wanted a neighbourhood plan for Lymington and Pennington that would have input from local people and could be adopted into the Local Plan. It would include a search for sites for the 150 additional homes as an alternative to the proposed Avenue Road and Pinetops sites.

On 23 Apr 2013, we took part in the meeting on greenbelt development in Lymington and Pennington at the hearing on the NFDC’s Sites and Development Management Plan. We put it to the Inspector that the plan was unsound as the Council had failed to provide evidence of having considered reasonable alternatives to the sites allocated and that the choice of locations locally might be better addressed through a Neighbourhood Plan. However, the Inspector said that he accepted NFDC’s proposition that the only sites where additional housing could be sited were within the green belt surrounding Lymington & Pennington. He said that the Inspector at the Core Strategy hearing had accepted this proposition and he was not going to disagree.

On 30th April, we attended a meeting with the Town Council on our request for a Neighbourhood Plan together with a number of local residents and members of the Pennington Residents Association, who had made a similar request to the Town Council in December 2012. We heard from Chris Elliott and David Groom of the NFDC that it was too late to embark on a neighbourhood plan that could be incorporated into the current Local Plan, as it was presently undergoing the final stage of its adoption. We heard that the need for affordable housing locally could only be met though greenbelt development. Town centre and brown-field site development was unlikely to provide an alternative because high land values meant lower margins in this type of development. The Council also had to achieve a balance of town centre uses e.g. in the longer term, a site like the Avenue Road Town Hall was more suitable for retail than housing e.g. a supermarket as it was near the town centre and had space for parking. Members of the Town Council that were present said that they could not contribute to a neighbourhood plan as they lacked the resources.

Where we are now
We now have the Inspector’s interim report; it does not question NFDC’s allocation at Pinetops and Alexandra Road; it only asks the Council to respond to a number of mainly technical questions. This will require a further round of public consultation. We will also have an opportunity to comment on planning applications that are made at these sites.

The way forward
This issue is not about to go away. There’s a shortage of homes now and growing demand. The government has told Local Planning Authorities to carry out a strategic review of their local plans under the NPPF (National Planning Policy Framework), starting in 2015 and have indicated that they will not accept the greenbelt as a reason NOT to meet local housing needs. This means our current Local Plan will only be in effect for another 2 years. The new plan could push the target for additional homes built in Lymington and Pennington between now and 2026 from the present figure of around 260 homes up to 1,000.

We need a change in approach. We need some fresh thinking and a forward looking approach to planning. Rather than wait for development proposals to come forward from developers, the Council should become more pro-active and look for imaginative implementation of their own policies. It’s time to challenge the developers – and their architects – to find solutions that provide high quality homes and integrate affordable housing within the fabric of the community.

We have asked the Town Council to address the question of a Neighbourhood Plan again in preparation for the Strategic Review in 2014/15

It looks like we have ended up with yet another unfortunate decision – this time it’s the allocation for development on greenbelt sites at Alexandra Road and Pinetops. We are told that it is too late to undertake a Neighbourhood Plan that would influence the current allocation. It’s not too late to carry out a Neighbourhood Plan that allows local people to take part in addressing issues likely to arise from the 2015 strategic review.

Yours faithfully

Clive Sutton

Greenbelt development – update

Green-fieldWe agree on the need for ‘affordable’ housing locally but the NFDC proposal to allocate development of around 150 houses on ‘green belt’ sites at Pinetops and north of Alexandra Road would compromise the town’s boundaries. Action: At the Sites & Development Management Plan hearing on 23 Apr 2013 LymSoc’s representative put it to Inspector that the SDMP was unsound as the Council had failed to provide evidence of having considered reasonable alternatives to sites allocated and that the choice of locations locally might be better addressed through a Neighbourhood Plan. Comment: Inspector accepted NFDC’s proposition that the only sites where additional housing could be sited were within green belt surrounding Lymington & Pennington (the Inspector at the Core Strategy hearing had accepted this proposition and he was not going to disagree). Status: Inspector’s interim report issued; it does not question NFDC’s allocation at Pinetops and Alexandra Road; it only asks NFDC to respond to a number of mainly technical questions, which, however, will require a further round of public consultation.

Background: The NFDC Sites and Development Management plan sets out the detailed proposals required to implement the planning strategy for the area agreed through the Core Strategy (adopted in 2009). The plan allocates a limited amount of greenfield land for new development to meet the local need for additional housing, affordable housing and employment. Between 2006 – 2026, the overall South East Plan requires 3,920 additional dwellings.

Planning 28 May 2013

sections1Travis Perkins site Lymington; Pennyfarthing Homes Ltd will soon submit proposals for a 23/ 25 home development. The planning consultants Tanner & Tilley have sent out a letter to local residents for their comments by 27.05.2013. LymSoc action: we posted details on our website with a copy of the PDF asking for comments; we contacted Tanner & Tilley Marketing Director to ask for a few days extension to their deadline as we expected to discuss the proposals at our next meeting 28.05.2013; also asked if the application is likely to be for outline permission only as with the drawings presented it’s only possible to focus on the lay-out and density of the proposals.

10360; The Lodge, 4 Milford Road; 4 houses; associated parking (demolition of existing). Comment: this was a tree lined stretch of Milford Road on the approach to Lymington from West.  A neighbour reports that the developer cleared the site including trees prior to his submission. Reccomendation: LymSoc to object on grounds of local distinctiveness; importance of location at entrance to town; ask for reduction in density; restore aspect. http://web3.newforest.gov.uk/ConnectAcolaidWebExternal/GetDocumentContentExternal.aspx?documentId=581523&filename=Proposed+Site+Layout+Plan.pdf

For the record

Sites & Development Management Plan; we agree on the need for ‘affordable’ housing locally but the NFDC proposal to allocate development of around 150 houses on ‘green belt’ sites at Lym 1 (Pinetops) and Lym 2 (north of Alexandra Road) would compromise the town’s boundaries. Action: LymSoc representative spoke at re-scheduled hearing 23 Apr 2013 and put it to the Inspector that the SDMP was unsound as the Council had failed to provide evidence of having considered reasonable alternatives to the sites allocated for additional housing and that the choice of locations locally might be better addressed through a Neighbourhood Plan. Comment: Inspector accepted NFDC’s proposition that due to land values within the town, the only sites where additional housing could be sited was within the green belt surrounding Lymington & Pennington; the Inspector at the Core Strategy hearing had accepted this proposition and he was not going to disagree. Status: Inspector’s interim report is due within weeks.

10257; Gordleton Industrial Park, Hannah Way; construct buildings for industrial, storage and business use (Use Classes B1, B2, & B8) (Outline Application with details only of access, layout and scale). Action: LymSoc objection submitted. Status: Application withdrawn by agent’s e-mail dated 10th May 2013. Comment: a revised application seems very likely before long so we need to remain vigilant and flag it so that people can have their say.

10148; Berthon Boat Company Ltd, Bath Road; retention of cladding; door and fenestration alterations to West Solent shed. Comment: Retrospective application to retain cladding carried out last year, resulting in the infilling of part of a building that was previously open sided. Site is just outside Conservation Area, although the new cladding is visible from viewpoints within and there is a Listed Building fairly close to the north side of the site. NFDC case officer says “The impact of the development on the character and appearance of the adjacent Conservation Area and the setting of the nearby Listed Building are material planning considerations”. However, you might think that cladding might actually be of benefit e.g. in terms of preventing pollution/ noise and is relatively immaterial compared to the presence of the shed itself. Action: none – we considered an objection but agreed the proposed cladding work looks innocuous. Status: NFDC Conservation Officer seeks clarification.

10163; 3 Grove Pastures (Conservation Area); single-storey rear extension. The case officer says “proposed rear extension would be in keeping with the existing property and would not be visible from the street”. Recommendation: leave to NFDC Conservation officer. Status: NFDC Conservation Team recommends approval subject to alterations in height/ design of cornicing and roof lanterns.

Enforcement update

EN/09/0270 Bridge Cottage; Bridge Road [Refers to APP/B1740/C/12/2175912 appeal against enforcement]. Status: decision date 30.10.2012; time for compliance: 12 months i.e. by end Oct 2013.

Buffalo Bar, St. Thomas St; neon signage.  Status: NFDC say they are putting together a case with a view to issuing legal instructions within around 2 weeks unless they comply.

EN/09/0614; Unit 3, Anchor House, Bath Road. Unauthorised Change Of Use: FROM A MIXED USE OF COMMERCIAL OFFICES AND COFFEE SHOP USE TO A MIXED USE AS A CAFE, RESTAURANT AND BAR WITH ASSOCIATED OUTSIDE EATING AND DRINKING SPACE. Status: enforcement notice issued; owner has appealed; an Inspector is to decide outcome using written representations (deadline 13.03.2013). APP/B1740/C/12/2189220; appeal against enforcement. Status: not yet decided. http://www.pcs.planningportal.gov.uk/pcsportal/ViewCase.asp?caseid=2189220&coid=210675.

Summer Garden Party 18th June 2013

6.00pm-8.00pm

Tickets £7.50

Elm_HouseWith the kind permission of Rachael and Peter Nuding, the Society’s Garden Party will be taking place in the historic gardens of Elm House in Church Lane. Hidden behind the crinkle-crankle walls built by Napolionic prisoners of war, this large and beautiful garden will provide a wonderful venue for this year’s garden party.

Lymington Society Organises Sell Out Trip Round Berthon Boatyard

home page bethonAt the kind invitation of Brian and Dominic May, Directors of the Berthon Boatyard in Lymington, the Lymington Society arranged for one of its varied programme of member’s social events to take place at the Berthon Boatyard on the 7th of May. This meeting proved to be one of the most popular that the Society has organised in recent years with almost 80 members and guests enjoying a fascinating and memorable visit to one of Lymington’s most important and high profile businesses.

Click here to read more