As the weather on the 13th was so bad the Garden Party has been postponed to Thursday June 27th.
Time and place remain the same: 6 pm at Moore Blatch, 48 High St Lymington
The Lymington Society wishes to express its sadness following the death of Dr Ivor Johnston, who served the Lymington Society for more than 20 years, most recently as President.
Ivor had a distinguished academic and medical background, and moved to Lymington to become a GP in 1960, finally retiring as Senior partner at Chawton House surgery in 2004, at the age of 70. He is fondly remembered by many of his patients.
His many contributions to Lymington include being a trustee of the Lymington Hospital League of Friends, and of the Solent Music Festival, of which he was a founder.
At the Lymington Society he acted as secretary for many years, before his recent elevation to President. One of his many claims to fame was the introduction to the Society of Clive Sutton, our Chairman.
Those of you who knew him will be pleased to know that he was very well looked after, enjoying an active and happy life up to the end.
Our thoughts are with Daphne and all of Ivor’s family and many friends. Lymington will not be the same without him.
The Lymington Society has already written a letter of opposition to the proposed development. Since then we have been able to read the views of the Lymington and Pennington Town Council and also the views of the Officers in relation to this application.
On behalf the Lymington Society I agree with all these views. It is self-evident that a development of this size will have a significant impact not only on the general character of the neighbourhood, but also on its neighbours. There is an argument to say that, wherever this development was placed it would be out of keeping with its surroundings and the interests of its neighbours.
The main concern of the Lymington Society in relation to this development is that is being proposed in an area which has a significant impact on the character of Pennington and Lymington.
I am sure you are all very well versed in the Local Distinctiveness Supplemental Planning Guidance, which have been developed for various areas of the New Forest. Our particular concern is with that for Lymington and Pennington, which was adopted in 2011 after discussions between the New Forest District Council, the Lymington Society and various other bodies.
Can I quote to you from that Guidance. Paragraph 4.9.3 in respect of Milford Road states:
“The busy Milford Road includes a variety of large suburban houses and bungalows each in a large garden setting, often containing forest sized trees. This road is perceived as a green corridor largely as a result of the large gardens, frontages furnished with trees and hedges and wide green verges. These elements are important and must not be allowed to become unduly compromised by gradual loss of garden space, incremental loss of hedges, or loss of verges through additional driveway crossovers or further hard surfacing”.
That quotation sums up the essence of what the Lymington Society has been trying to preserve in the approaches to Lymington, including Southampton Road and Avenue Road. Lymington and Pennington are lucky that until the last 10 or 20 years there has not been any significant pressure to redevelop the largely detached houses standing in their own gardens, which line these roads so that these roads take the traveller right up to the entrances to the Georgian high street, without having to pass that barrier of modern office and residential blocks which characterise so many other towns.
The Lymington Society fought hard to preserve the character of Southampton Road and Avenue Road. For some reason the character of Milford Road has not been under threat until recently.
Obviously there is the long-standing functional development of the shopping arcade at Foxpond which serves a necessary purpose. The Belmore Lodge development was justified as being a corner site setback in its own grounds and with an Art Deco style to it. However to go further and permit further redevelopment of detached houses next to Belmore Lodge and indeed anywhere up to Priestlands Place at the entrance to St Thomas Street and the High Street would start to tip the balance of the character of Milford Road away from that of a green corridor. I say that not only in relation to this location, but also locations on Milford Road closer to Lymington, which developers might think would be ripe for redevelopment of this nature.
There is no doubt that any town requires a mixture of housing of which residential units for the elderly are one category. Obviously, such residential units will free up other residential units required for families and young people and there may well be places in Lymington, where they are appropriate, and the North Close development on a brownfield site has turned out to be a good example of that. There must be other sites which could accommodate such a development without affecting the local character and the local distinctiveness, so clearly set out in the local distinctiveness supplemental planning guidance.
I appreciate that as a planning committee you cover the whole of your planning area but I am sure that you will look at each locality, according to its own character and the character of that area which has been adopted by your Council in its appropriate supplemental planning guidance.
I have quoted from the guidance for Lymington and the Lymington Society asks that for this application and for future similar applications you support that guidance. In doing so you will be supporting the wishes of the Lymington and Pennington Town Council as expressed in their representations
Here is the chairman’s message to our members advising you of our opposition to the inclusion of the site off Lower Pennington Lane in the Local Plan:
I am writing to you to advise you that the Committee of the Lymington Society has decided to oppose the inclusion by the NFDC of a site off Lower Pennington Lane for a major housing estate (for a minimum of 100 houses), as part of the “Local Plan Review” which the NFDC have recently published as part of a consultation exercise which ends on the 12th of August.
The Lymington and Pennington Town Council are also opposing this proposal.
We have reached this decision after careful consideration of the site and having reached the decision that the roads to the site are not capable of safely carrying the level of traffic this proposal will generate, without significant widening and suburbanisation, which would destroy the special semi-rural character of this important part of the town.
The special character of this part of the town is supposed to be protected by the Lymington Local Distinctiveness Supplementary Planning Guidance put in place by the NFDC and if this is set aside to allow this development to go ahead, then it will be increasingly hard to protect the special character of the town against the increasing level of development pressure which is evident at the moment.
I attach our press release which gives more details on our decision
In order to help residents make a decision and register their thoughts on the Local Plan Review, the Town Council is holding a meeting this Wednesday the 8th of August in the Council Chamber in the Town Hall from 7.00 pm to 9.00 pm
We have also added links to the NFDC Consultation on the LymSoc website to help you make your own representations to the NFDC before the deadline at midnight on the 12th of August.
Chairman of the Lymington Society
The NFDC consultation page can be found here. It includes a link to a representation form which can be filled in if you wish to comment.
The Lymington Society has lodged an objection to the plan before the NFDC for a development of 31 retirement flats in Milford Lane, Pennington, near to Belmore Lodge.
For the full text of the objection please see the Planning and Development page of this website. https://lymsoc.co.uk/planning-and-development-2/
Our data Protection statement has been updated to include the Friends of Sir Harry. Please see the data protection page under “The Society” in the website menu for the updated statement.
Thank you, Nigel Seth-Smith